流星之绊

Top anti-graft body vows more concrete measures_我的网站

一 |     Session reviews work in 1st half of 2026, calls for strengthened political oversight    China's top anti-graft body has vowed to advance discipline inspection and supervision work with higher standards and more concrete measures in the second half of 2026, focusing on strengthening political oversight, combating grassroots corruption and enhancing coordination among supervisory bodies.     The sixth plenary session of the 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing on Saturday. Li Xi, a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and secretary of the CCDI, addressed the session.    The session reviewed work carried out in the first half of the year and called for steadfastly following the Chinese path to combating corruption while promoting high-quality development of discipline inspection and supervision.    In the first half of this year, authorities nationwide filed 538,000 cases and punished 412,000 people, according to the CCDI and the National Commission of Supervision.    CCDI plenary sessions are generally held at the beginning of a year, but may also be convened midyear for major matters, interim reviews, personnel elections or to implement major decisions of the CPC Central Committee.    The session emphasized the importance of maintaining a correct view of performance and strengthening political oversight. It called for deepening political inspections, strictly enforcing discipline in leadership transitions and consistently improving conduct.    The session called for enforcing discipline, combating corruption and continuing concentrated rectification of misconduct and corruption at the people's doorsteps, in order to ensure the high-quality completion of all tasks for the year.    Tasks closely connected    Ji Yaping, a professor at Northwest University of Political Science and Law, said these tasks are closely connected. Political oversight should focus on whether officials truly follow a people-centered approach, implement central decisions, work pragmatically and respect objective laws, rather than pursue vanity projects or emphasize statements over results. Oversight itself should also avoid formalism and instead focus on effectiveness, Ji said.    Yang Weidong, a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, said this year is both the start of the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-30) and a year when local leadership transitions are taking place, making implementation of central decisions and prevention of risks during personnel changes particularly important.    Ji from Northwest University of Political Science and Law said that supervision during leadership transitions should ensure officials are selected according to standards of integrity and competence, while procedures remain lawful, transparent and subject to public oversight.    The meeting also called for continued concentrated rectification of misconduct and corruption affecting people's daily lives. Experts said that punishment should be combined with prevention, with greater emphasis on regulating the exercise of grassroots power.    Ji said that oversight should cover the authorization, exercise and supervision of power throughout the process to reduce opportunities for abuse.    Li Zhiwei, a lecturer at China University of Political Science and Law's School of Discipline Inspection and Supervision, said the effectiveness of grassroots anti-corruption work should not be measured simply by the number of cases handled, but also by whether the number of recurring problems declines, governance improves and people see tangible benefits.    Better coordination urged    Additionally, the session emphasized systematic and bottom-line thinking, calling for better coordination among different forms of supervision.    Experts said the discipline inspection authorities' work should be supervised by people's congresses, government departments and judicial, auditing and financial authorities, as well as the public and the media, so that different supervisory mechanisms reinforce rather than duplicate one another.    Yang said such coordination should also help identify deeper institutional and governance problems through individual cases and prevent similar misconduct from recurring.    The meeting also called for stronger internal oversight and continued efforts to make discipline inspection and supervision more standardized, law-based and regularized.    In the first half of the year, 1,685 discipline inspection and supervision officials were placed under investigation and 1,535 were punished.    Experts said that stronger self-supervision should be matched by better professional training, practical experience and internal checks. Ji called for narrowing capability gaps across regions and guarding against outside interference.                    。    全文1746字，阅读约需5分钟，帮我划重点          划重点          01韩国总统尹锡悦面临国会弹劾，调查机构连续两天传唤他接受调查，但遭到总统警卫处的拒收。         02尹锡悦确定辩护律师团队，由韩国广播通信委员会前委员长金洪一领衔，应对内乱罪调查和宪法法院的弹劾审判。         03宪法法院将于12月27日举行弹劾案的首场听证会，尹锡悦须出席。         04由于执政党内部动荡，党首韩东勋宣布辞职，权力进入真空期。         05舆论认为，韩东勋未能充分动员党内力量，其背后目的是捞取政治私利。         以上内容由腾讯混元大模型生成，仅供参考          韩国总统尹锡悦遭国会弹劾，政局动荡远未平息，调查机构继续“勒紧”绳索。         央视新闻称，当地时间12月16日，调查机构再次向尹锡悦发出传唤，要求他于18日到案接受调查，但遭总统警卫处拒收。当天下午，尹锡悦确定辩护律师团队。据称后者已应对检方的传唤要求，并准备发布辩护立场。

二 |          韩国政坛新一轮“司法战”即将打响。         尹锡悦确定律师团          16日上午，由韩国警察厅国家调查本部、高级公职人员犯罪调查处和国防部调查本部联合设立的“共同调查本部”向总统府发出传唤通知：以涉嫌内乱和滥用职权为由，要求尹锡悦于18日上午10时到案接受调查。         但是，传唤通知遭总统府和总统官邸的总统警卫处拒收。“共同调查本部”转而通过电子邮件形式，将通知副本发送给尹锡悦。         这是继韩国检方后，又有调查机构传唤尹锡悦。         15日，韩国检察厅紧急戒严特别调查本部称，曾于11日向尹锡悦发出传唤通知，要求他于当地时间15日10时赴首尔检察厅接受调查。但尹锡悦未予回应。

三 | 16日，检方再次向尹锡悦发出传唤通知。         此前，韩国检方以涉嫌内乱、滥用职权和妨碍行使权利等罪名对尹锡悦展开正式调查，并将尹锡悦指认为“内乱罪首犯”。         根据韩国法律，内乱罪的定罪分为三类：一是首犯，二是参与策划、指挥等重要任务者，三是普通参与者。内乱首犯的处罚为死刑、无期徒刑或无期监禁。

四 |          这是继前总统朴槿惠之后，韩国调查机构第二次指认现任总统为嫌疑人。

五 | 尹锡悦将如何回应“双重传唤请求”，备受关注。         据称，尹锡悦15日以“律师指定工作尚未完成”为由，未接受传唤。目前，他和夫人“隐居”首尔汉南洞的总统官邸，忙着组建以法律专家为主的辩护团队，为应对内乱罪调查和宪法法院的弹劾审判。         16日下午，尹锡悦辩护律师团队发表公告，宣布将由韩国广播通信委员会前委员长、前检察官金洪一领衔，以应对尹锡悦涉嫌“内乱罪”和弹劾案。律师团计划于今天或明天发表声明，公布辩护立场。         有消息人士16日称，尹锡悦律师团今天已应对了检方的传唤要求。         金洪一出身于检察系统，曾先后担任韩国大检察厅中央调查部部长、釜山高等检察厅检察长、国民权益委员会主席等职；2009年前后曾是尹锡悦的直属上司，2022年前后作为团队成员为尹锡悦的总统竞选提供助力。         外界预测，尹锡悦一直否认内乱指控，可能不会立即接受传唤要求；但也可能会审时度势选择对自己有利的到案时间和地点。因为如果一再拒绝传唤，尹锡悦可能面临新的危险。         根据《刑事诉讼法》规定，有充分理由怀疑犯罪嫌疑人有犯罪行为，且后者无正当理由拒不出庭时，当局可对其紧急逮捕或签发逮捕令。总统警卫队并无可阻止调查机构执行逮捕令的法律依据。         宪法法院月底首次聆讯          16日上午，韩国宪法法院就尹锡悦弹劾案举行首次会议，讨论弹劾案审理时间表及相关程序，决定于12月27日举行弹劾案的首场听证会。         听证会是在全面审理前整理控辩双方论点、证据和问题的程序。         16日当天，宪法法院指定两名法官为负责准备程序的预审法官，组建了以高级宪法研究员为组长的特别工作组，并确定案件的主审法官。

六 |          接下来，宪法法院会向尹锡悦发送立案通知，并要求尹锡悦提交答辩书。在完成所有相关程序后，宪法法院将举行弹劾审判公开辩论，届时尹锡悦须出席。         同在16日，宪法法院确认，即使在目前3名法官空缺的“六人制”情况下，也可启动对尹锡悦的弹劾审判。考虑到案件严重性，宪法法院决定搁置其余8起弹劾案件，优先审理本案。         法律界认为，宪法法院最快将在两个月内、最迟四个月内决定是否罢免尹锡悦。预计控辩双方将展开激烈斗争。         执政党党首批评声中辞职          调查和审理向前推进之际，执政党内部经历动荡，进入权力“真空期”。         16日上午，执政党党首韩东勋在国会举行记者招待会宣布辞职决定，并表示“不后悔”支持弹劾总统。         他解释称，由于执政党最高委员会5名最高委员辞职，最高委员会已经“崩溃”，作为党首无法再正常履职，因此决定辞职。

七 | 他还向国民致歉，称已尽力为国家找到除弹劾外的更好办法，但最终没能做到。         14日总统弹劾案在国会通过后，韩东勋受到党内亲尹锡悦派的强烈抗议。有议员要求他对弹劾投票负责，韩东勋则反驳道“我进行紧急戒严了吗？我投票支持弹劾了吗？”          据称，此言一出引发不少议员愤怒，场面一片混乱。

八 | 随后，亲韩东勋派的几名最高委员会委员宣布辞职，执政党领导层陷入“自动解散”状况。目前，党首职权暂由新任党鞭、亲尹锡悦派人物权性东代行。         舆论认为，韩东勋早前受尹锡悦拔擢，如今在弹劾问题上反复横跳，党内号召力备受质疑。他不仅无法控制党内亲尹锡悦派，也没能充分动员二三十名亲韩东勋派。

九 | 究其背后，以韩东勋为代表的韩国政客并没有把民众和国家利益放在首位，而是希望乘机扩大影响力，捞取政治私利，结果可能竹篮打水一场空。

十 |          查看原图 30K。

Current article:http://ba8d6.ningshunsaotuiqiao.shop/xabu3s/20260826/4222676.html

Published on:00:00:04